Evaluating Centres of Excellence - A Nordic perspective

To find out how best to evaluate excellence programmes, the Swedish Research Council has compared how such evaluations are done in other Nordic countries. The comparison shows that the methods vary between countries. In particular, it shows that mid-term evaluation has the greatest importance for this type of research funding, which is often referred to internationally as support for Centres of Excellence (CoE).

Long-term investments, where the funding bodies make repeated calls for funding of research proposals within the same excellence programme, increase the opportunities to achieve effective frameworks for follow-up and evaluation. This long-term approach provides clear incentives for higher education institutions to create structures for investment in centres of excellence. The long-term approach also provides incentives for follow-up systems that deliver data from the centres to the research funding bodies on an annual basis.


  1. Swedish research can be enhanced without expensive reorganisation

    The Swedish Research Council rejects the proposal for three new public agencies in our response to the consultation document proposing a new public agency structure for funding research and innovation. We consider that the proposal has too narrow a s...

  2. Important to strengthen research quality and international competitiveness

    The Swedish Research Council’s input to the Government’s research and innovation bill presents our views on what needs to be done to strengthen the Swedish research system and create good preconditions for excellent research that is of benefit to soc...

  3. Research and innovation are needed for a sustainable and secure society

    The Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Energy Agency, Formas, Forte, the Swedish National Space Agency and Vinnova have now submitted a joint document with recommendations ahead of the Government bill on research and innovation. Excellent research...