Evaluation of research quality in the ALF regions

The Swedish Research Council has been tasked to evaluate the quality of the clinical research conducted in the seven regions covered by the ALF agreement.

The 2021 evaluation has been postponed due to the corona pandemic

The evaluation is conducted every fourth year, which means that the next evaluation should have been done in 2021. Because of the great strain placed on health and medical care due to the corona pandemic, we have postponed the evaluation by one year.

The ALF agreement states that 20 per cent of the ALF funding for clinical research shall be allocated on the basis of research quality. The allocation of the funding is based on the Swedish Research Council’s evaluation of the quality of clinical research conducted in the ALF regions, and the resource allocation model produced by the national ALF steering committee

In this context, and according to Clause 7 of the ALF agreement, clinical research is defined as “research that requires access to the structures and resources of the health services, and for which the aim is to solve a health problem, or identify factors that lead to improved healthsuch research as assumes the structures and resources of healthcare, and has the goal of solving an ill health problem, or identifying factors that lead to increased health”.

Three aspects of quality are evaluated:

  1. The quality of the scientific output
  2. The clinical significance and societal impact of the clinical research
  3. The prerequisites for clinical research

In addition to forming the basis for the allocation of 20 per cent of the ALF funding, the evaluation aims to identify, highlight and reward good examples in the regions that stand out nationally through their quality work. These regions can then serve as examples to other regions. The long-term goal is to raise the quality of all Swedish clinical research.


How the evaluation is done

Three panels with international members evaluate and assess the documentation sent in by the ALF regions. The contents and grounds for assessment are decided by the Swedish Research Council, based on the starting points produced by the national ALF steering committee. The starting points of the steering committee are as follows:

1. The quality of the scientific output

2. The clinical significance and societal impact of the clinical research

3. The prerequisites for clinical research

PublISHED ON 21 August 2020

UpDATED ON 21 August 2020

MORE WITHIN THE SAME SUBJECT AREA

  1. New evaluation model shows that political science research is of high quality

    Is it possible to compare the quality of Swedish research in an international perspective? To answer this question, the Swedish Research Council has developed a new model for evaluating research, and tested it for political science. The evaluation sh...

  2. Quality and impact of research in political science in Sweden

    A pilot evaluation The Swedish Research Council has carried out an evaluation of political science as a research subject, using a new model for national evaluations of research subjects and thematic research fields. The purpose of the new model is t...

  3. New model for quality-based resource allocation

    Today, and on behalf of the Government, Formas, Forte, the Swedish Research Council and Vinnova are presenting a new joint proposal for a new model for quality-based resource allocation of new funding within the direct government grant. The model is ...