Research environment grant within artistic research

Please refer to the application form in Prisma in parallel with reading the instructions below, which describe the call-specific content of the application. More information on what to do in practical terms is available in our Guide for applicants Opens in new window..

Language

We prefer that you complete your application in English, but you may also use Swedish.

Sections of the application

The application form includes the following tabs:

• Descriptive information
• Research description
• Budget and research resources
• Publications and artistic outputs
• Administrating organisation
• Participants
• CV

The information we request under each tab is described below.

Descriptive information

Abstract

In the abstract, please describe in brief the following:

• What is to be done: purpose and aims
• How the research will be carried out: project organisation, time plan and methods
• What is important about the planned research

The abstract shall provide a summary picture of the purpose and implementation of the research. Please use wording to ensure persons with another subject specialisation can understand the information.

The description may cover a maximum of 1 500 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one third of an A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

Popular science description

Describe the planned research in such a way that a person who is not a researcher can understand it. Do this by answering the following questions:

• What is the research about?
• Why is it important to research this?
• In what way may the new knowledge be important?

The text must be in Swedish and cover a maximum of 2 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately half an A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing. The popular science description is important when we inform about the research funded by the Swedish Research Council.

Other applications or grants

Describe the relationship between the different projects if

• you are applying for or intend to apply for other grants from the Swedish Research Council
• you are receiving an ongoing grant from the Swedish Research Council with a grant period that wholly or partly overlaps with the grant you are now applying for
• you have applied to or are receiving a grant relating to the same project concept/purpose from the Swedish Research Council or other funding body (from you or another researcher)

In all cases, you should also justify why you are submitting one or several further applications. If there are no other applications or grants, please state so. The description may cover a maximum of 2 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

Research description

Ethical aspects

Legal and formal requirements

State whether the research covers the handling of personal data, or experiments on animals and/or studies involving humans.

If the research covers any of the above, you must also describe/state the approvals and permits your research project requires, and how you plan to obtain these. Describe any other permits that affect your application, such as whether parts of the research will be done in a country other than Sweden. If no approvals or permits are needed, please state so.

The description may cover a maximum of 2 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one half A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

More information is available on the page “Conducting ethical research” on the Swedish Research Council’s website Opens in new window.

Ethical considerations

Reflect on the ethical issues that may arise for your project, and describe these. You must also describe how you plan to address ethical dilemmas that may arise. Please justify why the research should be carried out against the background of the ethical issues you have identified. Examples of issues to reflect on:

• How do your research questions and expected results measure up in relation to the ethical issues?
• What (direct) risks (physical, mental, or integrity) will research persons or animals be exposed to?
• What long-term risks may arise from the research? Is there any risk that the research may be used in a way that is detrimental to animals, nature/the environment, or society (whole or parts of the same) in other respects?
• Is the research expected to contribute to other values over and above the knowledge gain? If so, to whom?
• How do you weigh up the risks (in particular short-term risks) against the value (which is often more long-term) of the research?

If no ethical issues are raised, please justify this. The description may cover a maximum of 4 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

Sex and gender perspectives

Please state whether sex and gender perspectives are applicable in your planned research, and justify your decision. Please note that we are not asking for information about the composition of the research team (men/women). Read more about sex and gender perspectives in research content. Opens in new window.

The following applies:

• If you answer “Yes”: Please justify your answer, and describe also how you take account of sex and gender perspectives in the research plan. If you have stated that sex and gender perspectives are applicable, but still choose not to include them in your research plan, you will need to justify this here.
• If you answer “No”: Please justify your answer.

The justification may cover a maximum of 4 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

Research plan

The research plan shall be forward-looking and consist of a brief but complete description of the research task. It shall cover a maximum of 10 page-numbered A4 pages in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing and 2.5 cm margins, including references and any images.

The research plan must include the following headings and information, listed in the following order:

• Purpose and aims: State the overall purpose and specific aims of the research project.
• State-of-the-art: Summarise briefly the current research frontier within the field or area covered by the project. State key references.
• Significance and novelty: Describe briefly how the project relates to previous research within the area, and the impact the project may have in the short and long term. Describe also how the project moves forward or innovates the current research frontier.
• Preliminary and previous results: Describe briefly your own previous research and pilot studies within the research area that make it probable that the project will be feasible. If no preliminary results exist, please state this. State also whether the project contributes further to research and scientific results from a grant awarded previously by the Swedish Research Council.
• Project description: Describe the project design under the following headings:
  • Theory and method: Describe the underlying theory and the methods to be applied in order to reach the project goal.
  • Time plan and implementation: Describe summarily the time plan for the project during the grant period, and how the project will be implemented. Describe also any crucial risks or obstacles that may impact on the implementation, and your plan for managing these.
  • Project organisation: Clarify how you and the participating researchers will contribute to the implementation of the project. Explain in particular how the time allocated by you (that is, your activity level) as project leader is suitable for the task, including the relationship with your other research undertakings. Describe and explain the competences and roles of the participating researchers in the project, and also any other researchers or equivalent who are important for the implementation of the project.

Provide the following information also. If a heading is not relevant to your application, please state this under the heading.

• Equipment: Describe the basic equipment you and your team have at your disposal for the project.
• Need for research infrastructure: Specify the project’s need for international and national research infrastructure. If you choose to use other infrastructure that those supported by the Swedish Research Council Opens in new window., and that are thereby open to all, you must justify this (also applies to local research infrastructure).
• International and national collaboration: Describe your own and the team’s collaboration with foreign and Swedish researchers and research teams. State whether you contribute to or refer to international collaboration in your research.

Relevance

Describe how your project is relevant for the focus artistic research (see the definition in the introduction to the call text) and how the project promotes the development of this field.

The description may cover a maximum of 4 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one A4 page in Arial, font size 11.

Budget and research resources

Project personnel

State the activity level (per cent of a full-time equivalent) of all personnel active within the project, that is to say yourself, the other researchers and other personnel. Please also state the salary you are applying for, for yourself and/or other personnel active within the project, both as a percentage of a full-time salary and as actual annual amounts (including social security contributions). Please state the amounts in Swedish krona, rounded to the nearest 1 000 SEK.

Other costs

Describe any other costs of the project (premises costs, running costs and depreciation costs). Please state the amounts in Swedish krona, rounded to the nearest 1 000 SEK.

You may include depreciation costs for equipment to be used in the project, provided that:

• the equipment has an economic life of at least three years
• the equipment has an acquisition value above a certain amount
• the need cannot be satisfied through use of national or international infrastructure supported by the Swedish Research Council and thereby open to all.

You may only include the proportion of depreciation costs that corresponds to the use of the equipment in the proposed project, and you may not include depreciation costs for equipment that is wholly funded by other grants. Please contact your administrating organisation for information about what is included in local research infrastructure, acquisition values or how to calculate depreciation costs.

Total cost of the project

Prisma will automatically add up your budget items in a table. The total amount you are applying for shall also include indirect costs. You will have to add these to the table yourself. Here you can also add any additional costs that the project entails (for which you are not seeking funding under this call).

Indirect costs follow the model that your administrating organisation uses. Please contact your administrating organisation if you have any questions about what constitutes indirect and direct costs.

Justification of the budget applied for

Justify briefly each cost applied for in your budget. The description may cover a maximum of 4 000 characters including blank spaces. This is approximately one A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing.

Note that indirect costs follow the model that your administrating organisation uses. You must therefore contact the administrating organisation to find out what applies to your project.

Other funding

Please state your or any other researcher’s funding for the project over and above what is applied for in this application. Please state the amounts in Swedish krona, rounded to the nearest 1 000 SEK.

Publications and artistic outputs

Applicant’s publication list

Please attach your publication list drawn up according to the headings and information below. The list shall cover a maximum of 5 page-numbered A4 pages in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing and 2.5 cm margins.

Sort the publications and artistic outputs under each heading in reverse chronological order, so that the latest published work is at the top of the list. Please only include articles or equivalent that are published or accepted for publication at the time of applying. The author name order shall be identical to that of the published work. The application cannot be supplemented with publications and outputs after the deadline for the call.

1. Selection of publications and artistic outputs: List the 10 publications or artistic outputs of greatest importance to your application. Describe how you contributed to each publication or output, and its relevance to the research project described (maximum 4 lines per publication). Highlight your name in bold in the author list.

2. Relevant publications and artistic outputs from 2014-2022: In this part, the publications or outputs listed under Item 1 shall also be included if they have been published or completed during the period in question. Sort the publications and outputs, with your name highlighted in bold in the author list, under each heading (publication type) in the following order:

• Exhibitions, concerts, performances, etc.
• Peer-reviewed original articles
• Peer-reviewed conference contributions, the results of which are not included in other publications
• Peer-reviewed edited volumes
• Research review articles
• Peer-reviewed books and book chapters
• Other publications including popular science books/presentations

Participating researchers’ publication lists

Attach all participating researchers’ lists of publications and artistic outputs joined up into one file. The list for each researcher shall include the 10 publications or artistic outputs that are the most relevant to the research described, and shall cover a maximum of 1 A4 page in Arial, font size 11, single line spacing and 2.5 cm margins. The name of the researcher in question shall be highlighted in bold and also be included in the page header of each list.

Please only include articles or equivalent that are completed, published or accepted for publication at the time of applying. The author name order shall be identical to that of the published work. The application cannot be supplemented with publications or outputs after the deadline for the call.

The publications and outputs shall be of the type artistic output, peer-reviewed original articles, conference contributions, edited volumes, research review articles, books and book chapters, and other publications including popular science books/presentations.

Administrating organisation

Please state the administrating organisation and project site.

Participants

Under this tab, you shall invite the participating researchers and any participating administrators to your application.

CV

Under this tab, please upload your relevant CV information from your personal account in Prisma. The participating researchers must upload their own CV information to the application.

The following information (where available) must always be included in each CV:

• Education: First, second and third cycle higher education and specialist degrees.
• Work: Current employment (including employment form) and longer relevant employment held, postdoctoral visits (also included as employment if relevant), research exchanges relevant to the research described and any longer interruptions in the research that have impacted on your opportunity to gain merit as a researcher.
• Merits and awards: Docentship/associate professorship, supervisees (postdoctoral and doctoral students; state the number of persons in each category and list the names of the up to 10 most relevant to you), up to 10 of your most relevant grants awarded in competition, up to 10 of your most relevant prizes and awards, and any other merits relevant to the application.
• Intellectual property rights: For example, patents and open access computer programs developed by you; state up to 10 of your most relevant.

Quality is the fundamental criterion when the Swedish Research Council allocates grants to research. Your application is evaluated in competition with the other applications on the basis of the following evaluation criteria.

Evaluation process

Your application for research environment grant within artistic research is evaluated by a review panel consisting of Swedish and international members who are active in artistic research.

At least three members review and grade your application individually. The entire review panel then meets at two review panel meetings, one during the spring and one during the autumn, to discuss and prioritise the applications, and finally to make a proposal for a decision to the Committee for Artistic Research.

Review panel Opens in new window.

In order to enable more in-depth discussions of applications of higher quality that have a reasonable chance of being funded, the applications that received the lowest grades from the panel members during the spring meeting are not discussed at the review panel meeting during the autumn. Ahead of the autumn meeting, the remaining applications are reviewed by each member of the panel, together with at least two external reviewers.

Following the grant decision, all applications receive a final statement that includes the review panels’ grading of the application. The applications that have been discussed at the second panel meeting receive an individual final statement which, in addition to the grades, also contains a summary of the review panel’s discussion and joint assessment of the quality of the application.

Here you will find a more comprehensive description of the Swedish Research Council's assessment of applications Opens in new window..

Evaluation criteria and guiding questions

The evaluation of the quality of your application is made based on four basic criteria (Quality as artistic research of the proposed project, Novelty and originality, Merits of the applicant, and Feasibility). The purpose of using several components is to achieve a multi-faceted evaluation. The criteria are assessed on a seven-grade scale, with the exception of feasibility, which is assessed on a three-grade scale. In addition to the basic criteria, your application is also evaluated using two additional criteria (Relevance, Synergy/Added value). Relevance is assessed on a three-grade scale and Synergy/Added value is assessed on the seven-grade scale.

For each criterion, there are guiding questions to support the review panel members’ evaluation of your application. These can also function as guidance for you when you write your application. The guiding questions are intended to serve as a help in interpreting the different assessment criteria. When assessing a project, some questions may address the project in question more or less well.

The projects will be assessed as artistic research. Based on the Vienna Declaration on Artistic Research, this is defined as research through means of high level artistic practice and reflection; an epistemic inquiry, directed towards increasing knowledge, insight, understanding and skills. Artistic research covers all artistic practices, and the result of the research consequently relate to a broad artistic field, either intradisciplinary, or inter- or transdisciplinary. It is thus not necessary for each individual project to contribute to the entire field of artistic research, instead it is sufficient to contribute to your own field.

Quality as artistic research of the proposed project (1–7)

Guiding questions:

• Will the project be able to make a significant contribution to artistic research and its future development?
  • Are the purpose, method and presentation of the research shown clearly?
  • How well integrated are the research problem, approach, methodology and artistic practice?
  • To what extent can the project be expected to achieve artistic qualities?
  • How well integrated is the gender perspective where it is justified? Does the application disregard sex and gender perspectives that could have been relevant?

Novelty and originality (1–7)

Guiding questions:

• Does the project ask new questions, and does it focus on original and innovative artistic questions?
  • Does the project investigate previously overlooked problems and/or practices?
  • Are new approaches and methods for implementing the research project tried?
  • Are transdisciplinary and/or other perspectives used, which contribute to further development of the research field and the artistic field?
  • Will the project result be presented in a way that allows its innovative contribution to be well expressed?

Merits of the applicant (1–7)

Guiding questions:

• Do the project participants – in particular the project leader – have the artistic research competence and experience that are needed to implement the research project?
  • Has the previous work of the project participants had impact within the area the research project relates to, both nationally and internationally?
  • Have the project participants demonstrated ability for independent and creative artistic research?
• Do the project participants have the relevant and complementary competence required to carry out the research task?
• Do the project leader and participating researchers have the artistic research competence and organizational experience required to build a long-term sustainable research environment?
• To what extent do the applicant and participating researchers have experience of supervising doctoral students (in case the application includes doctoral students)?

Feasibility (1–3)

Guiding questions:

• Is the design and time plan of the project realistic and suitable in relation to what is to be done?
  • Is there access to materials, equipment, and other resources required to implement the project?
  • To what extent is the proposed research method and the artistic working methods suitable for implementing the project?
  • Is the work allocation and collaboration formats between the project participants described in a satisfactory way?
• Have the ethical aspects of the project been highlighted, and to what extent is there a presentation of how any problems will be handled?
  • To what extent is there awareness of any risks for the implementation of the project, such as permit reviews, and plans for how any such should be handled?

Relevance (1–3)

Guiding question:

• To what extent is the proposed research project relevant to the artistic area and for the development of the artistic research field?

Synergy/Added value (1-7)

Guiding questions:

• To what extent does the research environment offer a unique combination of knowledge and competence required for the specific artistic research task?
• To what extent does the collaboration between the project participants create synergy effects and added value for artistic research?
• To what extent can the research environment strengthen the quality within the specific artistic research area, at the host institution(s), in Sweden and internationally, also in the long term?
• Does the proposed development of the research environment entail potential for innovative artistic research?

Overall grade (1–7)

The above subsidiary criteria are weighed together into an overall grade, which reflects the review panel’s joint evaluation of the application’s quality.