Applications for research grants are assessed by review panels composed of expert researchers. They assess the scientific quality of the application using four basic criteria:
- Novelty and originality
- Scientific quality of the project
- Merits of the applicant(s)
The first three criteria are assessed according to a seven-grade scale. The criterion of Feasibility is assessed according to a three-grade scale.
For some calls, the basic criteria above are supplemented with specific additional criteria, such as the relevance of the application, the interdisciplinary approach or other factors applying to the call in question. The assessment criteria used, and how they are used, is always specified in the call text.
When all grades are set, the review panel weighs them together to an overall grade – on the scale of 1–7.
Applications for research infrastructure grants are assessed in two stages. In the first stage – the needs inventory – the following criteria apply:
- Scientific relevance
- Strategic relevance
- National relevance
- Other key aspects
The first two criteria are assessed according to a seven-grade scale. The third and fourth criteria are assessed according to a three-grade scale.
When all grades are set, the advisory groups weigh them together and place the needs proposal in one of seven categories indicating varying degrees of priority.
We will shortly be publishing updated assessment criteria for the assessment of applications for grants to research infrastructure.
The Swedish Research Council uses three different grading scales for the assessment of applications.
Our seven-grade scale
We use this grading scale for assessing both applications for research grants and applications for research infrastructure grants.
7 = Outstanding. Exceptionally strong application with negligible weaknesses
6 = Excellent. Very strong application with negligible weaknesses
5 = Very good to excellent. Very strong application with minor weaknesses
4 = Very good. Strong application with minor weaknesses
3 = Good. Some strengths, but also moderate weaknesses
2 = Weak. A few strengths, but also at least one major weakness or several minor weaknesses
1 = Poor. Very few strengths, and numerous major weaknesses
Our three-grade scale for research grant applications
We use this grading scale only in our assessment of the “Feasibility” criterion:
3 = Feasible
2 = Partly feasible
1 = Not feasible
Our three-grade scale for applications for research infrastructure grants
This three-grade scale is used only for assessing applications for research infrastructure grants based on the criteria “Social benefit” and “E-infrastructure”.
3 = Excellent
2 = Good but with weaknesses
1 = Weak/Insufficient